The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1695•Rambo Associates v. South Tama County
06-1695Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2007
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1120
___________
Juan Estrada, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Linda Sanders, Warden, FCI *
Forrest City, Arkansas, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee, *
*
--------------------------------------- *
*
Juan Estrada, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Alison Luekefeld, DAP Coordinator, *
FCI - Forrest City; Francene Helaire, *
Case Manager, FCI - Forrest City; *
Mark Tipton, Unit Manager, FCI - *
Forrest City; Tracy Guthrie, Case *
Manager Coordinator, FCI - Forrest *
City; Linda Sanders, Warden, FCI - *
Forrest City; Jesse Jones, DAP *
Coordinator, South Central Regional *
Office; G. Maldonado Jr., Director, *
South Central Regional Office; Harrell *
Watts, Administrator, National Inmate *
Appeals; Harley Lappin, Director, *
-- 1 of 2 --
1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
-2-
Federal Bureau of Prisons; James *
D. Crook, Supervisory Attorney, *
Federal Bureau of Prisons; Does, *
other unknown Federal Bureau of *
Prisons staff at FCI - Forrest City, *
South Central Regional Office in *
Dallas Texas, Federal Bureau of *
Prisons’ Central Office in Washington *
DC and Federal Bureau of Prisons’ *
Consolidated Legal Center in *
Oklahoma, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 4, 2007
Filed:
___________
Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Juan Estrada appeals following the district court’s 1 dismissal of his petition for
a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Reviewing the issues de novo, we
conclude the dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.