The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-1695•Rambo Associates v. South Tama County
06-1695Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2007
1The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2680
___________
Maureen C. Sewall, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
John G. Csernansky, M.D., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 23, 2007
Filed: May 29, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Maureen Sewall appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of her pro se civil
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, see Osborn
v. United States, 918 F.2d 724, 730 (8th Cir. 1990), we conclude that the district court
correctly dismissed Sewall’s complaint against Dr. Csernansky for the reasons
explained by the district court.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We
also deny as moot appellee’s pending motion to dismiss.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.