The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2920•Linda M. White v. Riverview School
05-2920Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 27, 2007
1The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-4394
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Todd Andes, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 2, 2007
Filed: April 6, 2007
___________
Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Todd Andes appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded
guilty to a felon-in-possession offense. In a brief filed under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), his counsel asserts that Andes’s 188-month sentence is excessive
and that the district court violated Andes’s rights when it enhanced his sentence based
on prior convictions.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
We enforce the broad appeal waiver included in Andes’s plea agreement: the
plea colloquy reflects that Andes understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the
plea agreement, including the waiver; this appeal falls within the scope of the waiver;
and no injustice would result. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th
Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); see also United
States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing
appeal waiver in Anders case).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.