The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-3088•Dorcas Njenga v. Alberto Gonzales
05-3088Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 30, 2007
1The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1915
___________
Flora J. Moseley Smith, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Arkansas.
Chase Manhattan Mortgage *
Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 12, 2007
Filed: March 22, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff below claimed that a mortgage lender violated the Real Estate
Settlement Procedure Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e)(2)(c)(i), by charging her a
$5.00 fee for faxing her a payoff statement when she requested it. The district court 1
granted summary judgment to the lender and plaintiff appealed. This case is
controlled by Watt v. GMAC Mortgage Corp., 457 F.3d 781 (8th Cir. 2006), and
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Curran v. Washington Mut. Bank, 471 F.3d 857 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam), where
we rejected an identical claim, and we therefore reject the claim here.
We decline to address plaintiff's claim that even if a lender can charge fees in
the present circumstances, such fees must be reasonable, because the claim was raised
on appeal for the first time. See Watt, 457 F.3d at 784.
Affirmed.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.