The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-3088•Dorcas Njenga v. Alberto Gonzales
05-3088Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 30, 2007
1The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1746
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
David Brian Bern, * Northern District of Iowa.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: March 19, 2007
Filed: March 20, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
David Bern appeals his sentence of 300 months in prison, a variance below the
advisory Guidelines range of 360 months to life, imposed by the district court 1
following a remand for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.
220 (2005), see United States v. Bern, 156 Fed. Appx. 861 (8th Cir. 2005)
(unpublished per curiam). For reversal, Bern argues that recent Supreme Court
decisions warrant re-examination of whether the preponderance-of-the-evidence
standard of proof is sufficient for purposes of sentencing enhancements. We disagree.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 551 n.4 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (Booker does
not require sentencing judges to find sentence-enhancing facts beyond reasonable
doubt), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 266 (2005).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.