The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-3019•United States v. Amesheo D. Cannon
05-3019Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2007
1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3053
___________
Scherry Riggins, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
*
Pulaski Bank and Trust Company, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 12, 2007
Filed: January 26, 2007
___________
Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Scherry Riggins appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her employment discrimination and retaliation suit against her former
employer, Pulaski Bank and Trust Company. Having carefully reviewed the record,
see Kincaid v. City of Omaha, 378 F.3d 799, 803-04 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo standard
of review), we agree with the district court that Riggins failed to establish that Pulaski
Bank’s proffered legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for her termination were
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
pretextual. See Gilooly v. Mo. Dep’t of Health & Senior Servs., 421 F.3d 734, 739
(8th Cir. 2005) (burden-shifting analysis).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.