The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-3019•United States v. Amesheo D. Cannon
05-3019Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2007
1The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1305
___________
Donald Wayne Duncan, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.
*
United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 25, 2007
Filed: January 30, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Donald Wayne Duncan appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
dismissal of his lawsuit against the United States. To the extent Duncan’s brief--
which simply restates most of his claims and allegations--is sufficient to raise any
issues for review, see Harris v. Folk Constr. Co., 138 F.3d 365, 366-67 n.1 (8th Cir.
1998) (by failing to assert grounds for challenging certain rulings, appellant is deemed
to have waived related issues on appeal), we find no basis for reversal, see Moore v.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.