The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-3019•United States v. Amesheo D. Cannon
05-3019Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2007
1The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2648
___________
Ardell Fields-Bey, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Chuck Dwyer; Pat Smith; Stephen D. * Eastern District of Missouri.
Crawford, Dr.; Travis Cruse; Tom *
Sanders; John Moore; Charles M. * [UNPUBLISHED]
Lawson; David Burnhouse; Kim *
Klein; John Applebury; Gayle Roberts, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: December 29, 2006
Filed: January 9, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ardell Fields-Bey, confined to the Potosi Correctional Center (PCC) in
Missouri, appeals the district court’s1 orders dismissing some defendants based on
Eleventh Amendment immunity and granting summary judgment to the remaining
defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
medical needs. After a de novo review, see Thomas v. FAG Bearings Corp., 50 F.3d
502, 504 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review for dismissal based on Eleventh
Amendment immunity); Beck v. Skon, 253 F.3d 330, 332-33 (8th Cir. 2001)
(summary judgment), we conclude the dismissal and the grant of summary judgment
were proper for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.