The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1467•Thomas Evenstad v. Terry L. Carlson
05-1467Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2006
1The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-4059
___________
Katherine B. Warren, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Champion Enterprises, Inc.; Champion * Eastern District of Missouri.
Home Builders Company, doing *
business as Champion Homes of * [UNPUBLISHED]
Tennessee, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 31, 2006
Filed: November 1, 2006
___________
Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Katherine B. Warren appeals from the district court’s 1 entry of summary
judgment in favor of defendants in her personal injury action. The district court held
that Warren failed to raise genuine issues of material fact supporting her contention
that the “unsound mind” provision of Tennessee’s tolling statute excused her failure
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
to file within the one-year statute of limitations. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-106.
Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d
517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002), we find the district court’s analysis to be correct, thorough,
and well-reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.