The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1467•Thomas Evenstad v. Terry L. Carlson
05-1467Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitNov 30, 2006
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3988
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Northern District of Iowa.
Larry Jackson, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 6, 2006
Filed: November 14, 2006
___________
Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Larry Jackson has filed an untimely notice of appeal (NOA) from the district
court’s September 26, 2005 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction
motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A) (10 days to appeal in criminal cases); United
States v. Petty, 82 F.3d 809, 810 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (time limits for
appealing in criminal cases apply to appeal from denial of § 3582(c)(2) motion).
Because the NOA was due October 10, 2005, and is deemed filed October 19, see Fed.
R. App. P. 4(c) (prison mailbox rule), it was less than thirty days late, and thus we
remand to the district court to determine whether Jackson’s failure to file a timely
NOA was due to excusable neglect, and if so, whether the time for filing his NOA
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
should be extended. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Austin, 217 F.3d
595, 598 (8th Cir. 2000).
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.