The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-3294•United States v. Brian Bear Heels
05-3294Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2006
1
The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3315
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Lucio Martinez-Morfin, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: October 4, 2006
Filed: October 18, 2006
___________
Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Lucio Martinez-Morfin appeals the 120-month prison sentence imposed by the
district court 1 after Morfin pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with
intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine mixture, in violation
of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. On appeal, Morfin argues the district
court erred in not applying a minor-role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because it
did not correctly compare Morfin’s actions with those of a co-defendant who received
a minor-role reduction.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
The district court did not clearly err in denying the minor role reduction because
Morfin’s admitted knowledge of the drug-transportation and distribution plans showed
that he was “deeply involved” in the conspiracy. See United States v. Bustos-Torres,
396 F.3d 935, 947-48 (8th Cir.) (district court’s factual determination of defendant’s
role in offense may be reversed only if it is clearly erroneous, and it is defendant’s
burden to prove role reduction is warranted), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 2557 (2005) and
126 S. Ct. 203 (2005); United States v. Bush, 352 F.3d 1177, 1182 (8th Cir. 2003)
(showing defendant is less culpable than other defendants is not enough to entitle
defendant to minor-role adjustment if defendant was deeply involved in offense);
United States v. Goebel, 898 F.2d 675, 678 (8th Cir. 1990) (recognizing significant
role that distributors play in criminal drug activity).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.