The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-3294•United States v. Brian Bear Heels
05-3294Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 31, 2006
1The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3294
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
Brian Bear Heels, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: October 20, 2006
Filed: October 31, 2006
___________
Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Brian Bear Heels appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he
pleaded guilty to second degree murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 1111, and
2. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Bear
Heels objects to counsel’s request to withdraw.
Bear Heels’s plea agreement contains a valid appeal waiver. See United States
v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th
Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Having reviewed
the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), for any
nonfrivolous issues not covered by the appeal waiver, we find none. Accordingly, we
enforce the waiver, and dismiss the appeal. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.