The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-4324•United States v. Larry Charles Taylor
05-4324Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2006
1The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan
G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now
retired.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-3197
___________
Paul Stefanyshyn, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Shafer Contracting Co., Inc., *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 3, 2006
Filed: August 9, 2006
___________
Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Paul Stefanyshyn appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his complaint under
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Missouri Human Rights Act.
Following de novo review, see Meyer v. City of Joplin, 281 F.3d 759, 760 (8th Cir.
2002) (per curiam) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that
Stefanyshyn failed to state a claim under either statute, see 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)-(c)
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
(defining types of prohibited age discrimination); Minn. Stat. § 363A.08(2) (2004)
(defining types of prohibited discrimination).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.