United States v. Larry Charles Taylor

05-4324Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2006

Full text

1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan
Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2379
___________
Carl J. Hach, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Marty C. Anderson, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 3, 2006
Filed: August 8, 2006
___________
Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Carl J. Hach appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged two prison disciplinary violations and
the resulting loss of good-time credit. The district court held that the finding of guilt
on the first violation was supported by some evidence, and that Hach had procedurally
defaulted his challenge to the second violation by not timely exhausting his
administrative remedies. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
submissions on appeal, we conclude the district court’s judgment was correct.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.