The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-4324•United States v. Larry Charles Taylor
05-4324Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2006
1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan
Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2379
___________
Carl J. Hach, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Marty C. Anderson, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 3, 2006
Filed: August 8, 2006
___________
Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Carl J. Hach appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged two prison disciplinary violations and
the resulting loss of good-time credit. The district court held that the finding of guilt
on the first violation was supported by some evidence, and that Hach had procedurally
defaulted his challenge to the second violation by not timely exhausting his
administrative remedies. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
submissions on appeal, we conclude the district court’s judgment was correct.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.