The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2847•Lance Milliman v. Betty Jean Lindemoen
05-2847Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2006
1The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2929
___________
Kendrick Harris, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Maureen Clyde, Manager, America’s *
Center, Edward Jones Dome; Vicky * [UNPUBLISHED]
Anthony, Manager, Chief Guest *
Service; Debbie Smith, Supervisor; *
Renee Dahlmann, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 6, 2006
Filed: July 11, 2006
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Kendrick Harris appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6) dismissal of his employment-discrimination action. Having conducted de
novo review, and accepting the facts in the complaint as true and construing them in
Harris’s favor, see Gordon v. Hansen, 168 F.3d 1109, 1113 (8th Cir. 1999) (per
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
curiam), we find the district court’s analysis to be correct, thorough, and well-
reasoned. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellees’ pending
motion.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.