The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-3208•Gregory Alan Hill v. KC Metro Task Force
04-3208Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2006
1The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2372
___________
Susan Carol Bishop, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Western Surety Company; Jennifer * Eastern District of Missouri.
Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg *
Melton, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 2, 2006
Filed: May 5, 2006
___________
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Susan Bishop (Bishop) appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of her civil complaint. Having conducted de novo
review of the dismissal, and having accepted the facts in the complaint as true and
construing them in Bishop’s favor, see Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch.
Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir. 1998), we find the district court’s analysis to be
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
thorough and well-reasoned, and we reject Bishop’s arguments for reversal.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.