USA v. Dale D. Mitchell, Jr

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-3665
___________
Berry Allen Willis, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Centennial Mortgage & Funding, Inc.; *
Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel; Wells * [UNPUBLISHED]
Fargo Bank of Minnesota; James C. *
Bernstein; Bonnie J. Polta; Daniel M. *
Gallatin; Chris Lubin; Minnesota *
Department of Commerce; Hennepin *
County District Court; State of *
Minnesota Office of Administrative *
Hearings; Sharon Denise Atkinson; *
RSKCO, a CNA Company of *
Minnesota; Trent E. Bowman; Al *
Gelschus; Apex Appraisal Services, *
Inc., c/o Kathleen A. Midthum; *
Forsythe Appraisal, c/o Tim Forsythe; *
Holly Hollister; Kathleen A. Midthum; *
Tim Forsythe; Shara Mras, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 7, 2006
Filed: April 11, 2006
___________

-- 1 of 2 --

1The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-
Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Berry Allen Willis appeals the district court’s1 judgment, in part dismissing for
failure to state a claim and in part granting summary judgment against him, in his
action under federal civil rights provisions and state law. Having conducted de novo
review of the record, see S.J. v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 294 F.3d 1025, 1027
(8th Cir. 2002) (summary judgment); Atkinson v. Bohn, 91 F.3d 1127, 1128 (8th Cir.
1996) (per curiam) (dismissal for failure to state claim), we find the district court’s
analysis to be thorough and well reasoned, and we reject Willis’s baseless arguments
for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Willis’s
pending motion.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --