The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-3051•United States v. Derrick K. Patterson
04-3051Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2006
1The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-1567
___________
Charles Pointer, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Riverview Gardens School District; *
Unknown Montgomery, former * [UNPUBLISHED]
Assistant Principal at Riverview *
Gardens High School; Gwen *
Rosenfeld, Assistant Superintendent of *
Personnel, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 2, 2006
Filed: March 28, 2006
___________
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Pointer appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his Title VII and state-law employment-discrimination case against Riverview
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Gardens School District and two of its employees. Pointer alleged that his
termination from a substitute teaching position was based on his race and sex.
After de novo review, see Kasper v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co., 425 F.3d 496, 502
(8th Cir. 2005), we conclude the grant of summary judgment was proper for the
reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We also deny defendants’ motion to take judicial notice and Pointer’s motion
for sanctions.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.