The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-3051•United States v. Derrick K. Patterson
04-3051Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2006
1The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-3051
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Derrick Patterson, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: March 6, 2006
Filed: March 31, 2006
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Derrick Kim Patterson appeals his conviction for possession with intent to
distribute cocaine base. He argues that the district court 1 abused its discretion in
restricting cross-examination of the informant who testified against him. Having
carefully reviewed the record and applicable law in this case, this court concludes
that, even if there were error, it was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence
supporting the conviction. AFFIRMED. See 8 th Cir. R. 47B.
_______________________________
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.