The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-4029•Craig Thorstenson v. Gale Norton
04-4029Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2006
1The Honorable Lawrence Piersol, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of South Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-2260
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
Darla Louise Sanders, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 19, 2006
Filed: February 16, 2006
___________
Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
A jury found Darla Louise Sanders guilty of conspiring to possess
methamphetamine and marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 846. The district court 1 sentenced her to 132 months in prison and 5 years of
supervised release, and she appeals.
Sanders challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, we conclude
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
that it is sufficient. See United States v. Causor-Serrato, 234 F.3d 384, 387-88 (8th
Cir. 2000) (standard of review; elements of conspiracy). In short, the jury was entitled
to believe the government witnesses and disbelieve the defense witnesses. See United
States v. Fellers, 397 F.3d 1090, 1099 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 415 (2005).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.