The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-2497•United States v. Howard Eugene Liner
04-2497Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJan 31, 2006
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-4031
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Alberto Torres, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 5, 2006
Filed: January 20, 2006
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Alberto Torres pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with
intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of
21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court 1 sentenced him to 210 months’ imprisonment and
5 years’ supervised release. Torres did not appeal. The government later filed a
motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) to reduce the sentence.
The district court granted the motion and reduced Torres’s sentence to 120 months’
imprisonment and 5 years’ supervised release.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In pro se submissions, Torres claims ineffective
assistance of counsel, but any such claim should be raised in a motion pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Lee, 374 F.3d 637, 654 (8th Cir. 2004), cert.
denied, 125 S. Ct. 2962 (2005). Having reviewed the record independently under
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and deny
Torres’s request for new appellate counsel.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.