The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-3651•Nery G. Ventura v. Dept. of Homeland
04-3651Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 30, 2005
*The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-3664
___________
Linda Cooper-Igwebuike, Rev., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
United Methodist Church, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee, *
*
Janice Riggle Huie, Bishop, *
*
Defendant. *
___________
Submitted: December 7, 2005
Filed: December 27, 2005
___________
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
The Reverend Linda Cooper-Igwebuike appeals the district court’s * dismissal
with prejudice of her Title VII action. Having reviewed the record de novo, we agree
the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, because the case fell under the
ministerial exception to Title VII. See Scharon v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Presbyterian
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Hospitals, 929 F.2d 360 (8th Cir. 1991). Moreover, we fail to see how Cooper-
Igwebuike was prejudiced by the district court’s failure to consider her motion for
appointed counsel before dismissing the action. See Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph
Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1005 (8th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.