The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1459•USA v. Mathias Pizano
1The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-1820
___________
Jeffrey L. Thurman, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Michael Kemna, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 26, 2005
Filed: August 31, 2005
___________
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri inmate Jeffrey Thurman appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Having conducted careful de novo review, see Gordon v. Hansen, 168 F.3d 1109,
1113 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we conclude that the district court did not err in
dismissing Mr. Thurman’s complaint. We also conclude that the court did not abuse
its discretion in denying Mr. Thurman’s motions to amend his complaint, or in
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
refusing to order the production of documents at this early stage of the litigation. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.