The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-3828•General Electric v. Union Planters Bank
03-3828Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 31, 2005
*
The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-1993
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
v. * District of Missouri.
*
John W. Overcast, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 26, 2005
Filed: May 31, 2005
___________
Before SMITH, FAGG, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
John W. Overcast appeals the sentence the district court * imposed after
Overcast pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Overcast has
filed two supplemental briefs. We find no merit in any of the arguments raised by
Overcast or his counsel.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Having conducted an independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,
80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Thus, we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.