The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
04-1618•Lawrence E. Lupien v. Harold W. Clarke
04-1618Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2005
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-3407
___________
United States of America, *
*
Plaintiff - Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska
Mario D. Alford, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Defendant - Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 16, 2005
Filed: March 16, 2005 (Corrected March 17, 2005)
___________
Before BYE, HEANEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
The defendant in this case was sentenced prior to the United States Supreme
Court decision in United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). The defendant
raised and preserved error as to the constitutionality of the federal sentencing
guidelines at the time of sentencing. The defendant was also sentenced to the
minimum possible sentence under the applicable federal sentencing guidelines.
Accordingly, we cannot say that the error in this case was harmless. We therefore
vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to United States v. Booker,
125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). See, United States v. Haidley, No. 04-3312 (filed March 16,
2005).
___________________________
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.