The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1781•United States v. Ronald S. Morin
03-1781Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2005
1The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-1737
___________
Phyllis E. Toston, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Missouri Division of Employment *
Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 4, 2005
Filed: February 7, 2005
___________
Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Phyllis Toston appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in this Title VII action Toston brought against her former employer, the Missouri
Division of Employment Security. Following careful review, we agree with the
district court that Toston presented nothing in support of her bare allegation that her
employer’s legitimate reason for terminating her--poor performance--was a pretext
for race discrimination, see Riggs v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 385 F.3d 1164,
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
1166 (8th Cir. 2004), or retaliation, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733,
738 (8th Cir. 2004). In addition, to the extent she pleaded a hostile-work-
environment claim, Toston failed to show harassment pervasive or severe enough to
affect a term, condition, or privilege of her employment. See id. at 739. Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.