The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2105•Michael Chapman v. Lab One
1The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-1626
___________
Vicky M. Wright, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Nonpareil, an Iowa Corporation, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 4, 2004
Filed: November 12, 2004
___________
Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Vicky Wright applied for an editor position with a newspaper owned by
Nonpareil. The managing editor interviewed Wright, but hired a candidate who,
unlike Wright, had newspaper editing experience and was familiar with the software
used by the paper. Wright brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1981 action, claiming Nonpareil
refused to hire her because of her race. The district court 1 granted Nonpareil’s motion
for summary judgment, and Wright appeals.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Assuming without deciding that Wright established a prima facie case of
discrimination, we agree with the district court that she failed to show Nonpareil’s
articulated nondiscriminatory reason for not hiring her was a pretext for race
discrimination. See Kincaid v. City of Omaha, 378 F.3d 799, 803-06 (8th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.