The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-3642•Michael W. Ryan v. Harold W. Clarke
03-3642Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitOct 29, 2004
1The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-1043
___________
Gary Eugene Graham, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Falls City Prosecutor; Maria Moran, *
Prosecutor; Falls City Sheriff’s * [UNPUBLISHED]
Department, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: October 19, 2004
Filed: October 26, 2004
___________
Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gary Graham appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing two defendants in
this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Because the order allowed process to be served upon
the third defendant, the order is not final under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we lack
jurisdiction to review it at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (courts of appeals have
jurisdiction over appeals from final decisions of district courts); Bullock v. Baptist
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Mem’l Hosp., 817 F.2d 58, 59 (8th Cir. 1987) (order dismissing complaint as to fewer
than all defendants is not final order within meaning of § 1291).
We deny as moot his pending motion.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as premature.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.