The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1261•United States v. Santos Portillo
03-1261Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitAug 31, 2004
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-2638
___________
Donnie Ray Wilkinson, *
*
Plaintiff-Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Hot Springs Police Department; *
Garland County Sheriff Department; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Federal Bureau of Investigation, in *
Hot Springs, Arkansas; Does, City *
Attorneys, Judges in Hot Springs, *
Arkansas, and the Judges of Arkansas, *
*
Defendants-Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 22, 2004
Filed: August 3, 2004
___________
Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Donnie Ray Wilkinson brings this pro se appeal challenging the district court’s
dismissal of his case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). After granting
Wilkinson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the district court concluded that
Wilkinson’s complaint was frivolous and dismissed it because it did not allege any
basis for the court’s jurisdiction or any actionable legal theory and appeared to be an
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
attempt to avoid other court rulings. After de novo review of the record, Moore v.
Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we affirm the district court.
See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.