USA v. Carlos D. Dickerson

03-1456Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMay 28, 2004

Full text

*
The Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, Judge of the United States Court of
International Trade, sitting by designation.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1996
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District
v. * of Minnesota.
*
Therase LaShown Warren, also * [UNPUBLISHED]
known as "Slow," *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 10, 2004
Filed: May 17, 2004
___________
Before MURPHY and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,* Judge of the United
States Court of International Trade.
___________
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted Therase LaShown Warren of distributing eight and a half
ounces of crack cocaine to a cooperating witness on July 15, 2002. Warren appeals
asserting the evidence was insufficient to convict him. Having carefully reviewed the
record in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude a reasonable jury could

-- 1 of 2 --

**
The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
-2-
have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Warren distributed crack cocaine. See
United States v. Davis, 357 F.3d 726, 728 (8 th Cir. 2004) (standard of review).
Evidence included testimony by the cooperating witness, testimony by the
surveillance officers, transcripts of telephone conversations between Warren and the
cooperating witness, Warren’s fingerprints on the plastic bag containing the crack
cocaine sold to the cooperating witness, and Warren’s possession of the prerecorded
buy money in his pants pocket immediately after the transaction. Any questions
about the cooperating witness’s testimony was for the jury alone to decide, and other
evidence supported the cooperating witness’s testimony. See id. Contrary to
Warren’s assertion, the officers thoroughly searched the cooperating witness and his
vehicle before the transaction occurred.
We thus affirm Warren’s conviction.** See 8 th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.