The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1449•United States v. Otho Leonard Rater
03-1449Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2004
1 The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District
of North Dakota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-3066
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of North Dakota.
Enrique Cahue-Rangel, also known as *
Antonio Diaz-Lopez, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 5, 2004
Filed: April 14, 2004
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Enrique Cahue-Rangel appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed when
he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation following a conviction for an
aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Cahue-Rangel’s
counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
738 (1967), contending that, for several reasons, the district court should have
granted Cahue-Rangel a downward departure.
We conclude, however, that the district court’s refusal to depart is
unreviewable because the court recognized its authority to depart and declined to do
so. See United States v. Koons, 300 F.3d 985, 993-94 (8th Cir. 2002).
After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75
(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we deny the
government’s motion to dismiss, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the
judgment.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.