The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-3361•United States v. Solorio-Menera
02-3361Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2004
1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-3029
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Eugene Carlos Hill, * Eastern District of Missouri.
*
Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: March 18, 2004
Filed: March 23, 2004
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Eugene Hill, a federal inmate, pleaded guilty to a drug conspiracy offense in
June 2002. In October 2002 the district court 1 sentenced him to 70 months
imprisonment and 4 years supervised release. Hill subsequently filed a motion with
the district court requesting credit against his sentence for the time he had spent under
house arrest before his incarceration. The district court denied the motion and, after
careful review of the record, we affirm.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
We conclude that the district court did not err in denying Hill’s motion,
because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by first presenting his claim
to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). See United States v. Chappel, 208 F.3d 1069, 1069
(8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam). However, we modify the district court’s order to be
without prejudice so that, after exhausting his BOP remedies, Hill may file an
appropriate 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition if he wishes. See id. at 1069-70.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.