The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-3361•United States v. Solorio-Menera
02-3361Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2004
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-2586
___________
Joseph R. Ferri, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
The Gallup Organization, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 8, 2004
Filed: March 26, 2004
___________
Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Joseph R. Ferri (Ferri) appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in his action claiming age discrimination. After careful de novo
review of the record, see Schiltz v. Burlington N. R.R., 115 F.3d 1407, 1411 (8th Cir.
1997), we discern no prejudicial error in the court’s grant of summary judgment, and
we affirm. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of
Ferri’s motion to amend his complaint, see Hannah v. City of Overland, Mo., 795
F.2d 1385, 1392-93 (8th Cir. 1986) (standard of review), or in the court’s discovery
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
rulings, see Roberts v. Shawnee Mission Ford, Inc., 352 F.3d 358, 360 (8th Cir. 2003)
(standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.