The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-3361•United States v. Solorio-Menera
02-3361Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2004
1 The Honorable Michael B. Thornton, United States Tax Court Judge.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1682
___________
Mohammad J. Hashemi; *
Nahid Hashemi, *
*
Appellants, * Appeal from the United States
* Tax Court.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 6, 2004
Filed: March 18, 2004
___________
Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Mohammad and Nahid Hashemi appeal the tax court’s1 order granting the
motion of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) for the entry of a
decision. The Hashemis admit they have no quarrel with the tax years underlying the
Commissioner’s motion, and we agree with the tax court that it lacked jurisdiction
over the Hashemis’ challenges involving other tax years. See 26 U.S.C. § 6214(a),
(b) (tax court lacks jurisdiction to determine overpayment or underpayment for years
for which notice of deficiency has not been sent to taxpayer); Spector v. Comm’r, 790
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
F.2d 51, 52 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (tax court is court of limited jurisdiction), cert.
denied, 479 U.S. 884 (1986). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.