The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1074•USA v. Thomas J. Ballanco
1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-2465
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Terrence S. Diamond, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 4, 2004
Filed: February 18, 2004
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Terrence S. Diamond pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm.
At sentencing, the district court1 departed upward to a Category V criminal history
and sentenced Diamond to 105 months in prison and 3 years supervised release. On
appeal Diamond argues the district court erred in departing upward without
comparing his criminal history to that of most defendants with a Category V criminal
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
history, and by failing to enumerate what specific aspects of his background
warranted an upward departure.
After carefully reviewing the record de novo, see United States v. Flores, 336
F.3d 760, 763 (8th Cir. 2003), we conclude that Diamond’s arguments are either
without legal merit or are unsupported by the record, see United States v. Levi, 229
F.3d 677, 679 (8th Cir. 2000) (district court is not required to compare defendant
explicitly to other offenders in particular criminal history category before departing
upward); United States v. Hendricks, 171 F.3d 1184, 1188 (8th Cir. 1999) (when
departing, court must explain why Guidelines sentence is inadequate, identify specific
factual basis for departure, and explain why resulting sentence is reasonable);
U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, p.s. (court may depart upward if reliable information indicates that
defendant’s criminal history category does not reflect seriousness of his past criminal
conduct or likelihood he will commit other crimes).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.