The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-3745•Duane Dewey Anderson v. Ind. School Dist. 97
02-3745Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitDec 31, 2003
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H.
David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-2119
___________
Andrew Jackson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 2, 2003
Filed: December 10, 2003
___________
Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing as time-barred
his complaint seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance
benefits and supplemental security income. Having carefully reviewed the record and
the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was proper, because
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
the complaint was filed more than sixty days after Jackson’s attorney received notice
of the Commissioner’s final decision. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Bess v. Barnhart, 337
F.3d 988, 990 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (limitations period under § 405(g) is
triggered by notice received by either claimant or claimant’s attorney, whichever
occurs first).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.