Duane Dewey Anderson v. Ind. School Dist. 97

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1779
___________
In re: Donald Nangle, *
*
Debtor. *
------------------------------------------ *
*
Donald Nangle, *
* Appeal from the United States
Appellant, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
* for the Eighth Circuit.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Leslie A. Davis, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 5, 2003
Filed: December 12, 2003
___________
Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Debtor Donald Nangle (Nangle) appeals from a bankruptcy appellate panel
order concluding, alternatively, Nangle lacked standing to appeal the bankruptcy

-- 1 of 2 --

1 The Honorable Barry S. Schermer, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
court’s 1 order approving a settlement. Upon de novo review, see Park v. Forest Serv.,
205 F.3d 1034, 1036 (8th Cir. 2000), we conclude that while Nangle had standing to
object in the bankruptcy court to the settlement agreement, see Fed. R. Bankr. P.
2002(a)(3); In re Thompson, 965 F.2d 1136, 1140 (1st Cir. 1992), he lacked standing
to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order approving the settlement, because he could not
show he has a pecuniary interest in the order, see In re Marlar, 252 B.R. 743, 748
(B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2000) (party ordinarily has no standing to appeal unless party can
show basis for arguing that challenged action caused him cognizable injury, i.e.,
party was aggrieved by order) aff’d, 267 F.3d 749 (8th Cir. 2001); Spenlinhauer v.
O’Donnell, 261 F.3d 113, 117-19 (1st Cir. 2001) (standing to appeal from bankruptcy
court order requires showing that challenged order directly and adversely affects
appellant’s pecuniary interests).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________

-- 2 of 2 --