The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2841•Richard P. Landers v. Natl. RR Passenger
02-2841Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 30, 2003
1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-2106
___________
James Joseph Owens-El, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Western District of Missouri.
*
Bill Hedrick, Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: September 3, 2003
Filed: September 11, 2003
___________
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
James J. Owens-El appeals the District Court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’
submissions on appeal, we conclude that the District Court did not abuse its
discretion in denying Owens-El’s motion. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998
(8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review; Rule 60(b) is not vehicle for reargument of
merits, and movant must show exceptional circumstances to justify relief), cert.
denied, 534 U.S. 975 (2001). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.