The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2841•Richard P. Landers v. Natl. RR Passenger
02-2841Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitSep 30, 2003
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1367
___________
Odis Jackson, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of
v. * an Order of the
* Railroad Retirement Board.
Railroad Retirement Board, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: September 3, 2003
Filed: September 29, 2003
___________
Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Odis Jackson petitions for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (Board’s)
final decision denying his application for an annuity increase. Having carefully
reviewed the record, see Worms v. Railroad Retirement Bd., 255 F.3d 502, 505 (8th
Cir. 2001) (standard of review), we affirm. Jackson has identified no legal authority--
and we have found none--to support his position that he is entitled to an annuity
increase based on his minor grandson retroactive to February 1993. Accordingly, we
affirm the decision of the Board. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.