The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-2874•United States v. Mary E. Taylor
01-2874Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJul 31, 2003
1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3621
___________
Ronnie Lockard, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.
*
Department of Agriculture, Farm * [UNPUBLISHED]
Service Agency; Len Blaylock, Jr., *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 17, 2003
Filed: July 24, 2003
___________
Before BOWMAN, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ronnie Lockard appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his action against
federal defendants. Lockard and his mother had previously brought a similar action
in federal court that was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, given monetary limits as
to some claims and the failure to exhaust administrative remedies as to other claims.
In the instant action Lockard presented no additional allegations, and we conclude
jurisdiction was still lacking. We therefore affirm the dismissal of this action for lack
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
of jurisdiction, but modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. See Ahmed v.
United States, 147 F.3d 791, 796 n.5, 797-98 (8th Cir. 1998) (district court’s decision
may be affirmed on any ground supported by record; dismissal for lack of jurisdiction
is not adjudication on merits and thus should be without prejudice).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.