The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-2867•Mary Sue Shipley v. AR Blue Cross & Blue
02-2867Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJun 30, 2003
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-2369
___________
Michael Williams, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
David Crist, Warden; Mary McComb, *
Assistant Warden; Mark Thielen, A- * [UNPUBLISHED]
West Operations; Sue Nau, Program *
Director; Wendell Anderson, A- *
Segregation Lieutenant; Miller, *
Canteen Lieutenant; Debra Nelson, *
Disciplinary Supervisor; Craig Oseland, *
Disciplinary Member; Finnegan, Squad *
Sergeant; Salazar; Stroeing, A- *
Segregation Officer; Nancy Manson, *
Health Care Unit Supervisor (former); *
John Schotzke, Health Care Unit *
Doctor; Melinda K. Morse; A. Haffner, *
Segregation Sergeant; Lt. Levasseur, *
A-Segregation Sergeant; Doug Waiters, *
Property Officer; Lisa Erickson, *
Officer; Sara Newcomb, Officer; *
Gretchen A. Otto, L.A.P. Attorney; *
Linda Hardee, Program Director and *
Chief Sponsor; David Paulson, Medical *
Director of D.O.L.; John Lamey, M.D.; *
Dana Baumgartner, Health Care *
Administrator; Christopher Ceman, *
M.D.; Maureen Connor, H.C.U. *
Administrator; Mike Seath; Nedra *
-- 1 of 2 --
1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond
L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Fitzloff-Meyer; Olson; Carbo, *
Assistant Warden, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: June 3, 2003
Filed: June 27, 2003
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota inmate Michael Williams appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant
of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against various prison officials
and employees and medical personnel. After carefully reviewing the record, we
conclude that summary judgment--as well as the rulings related to Williams’s motions
for appointed counsel, and his attempt to file a belated amended complaint--were
proper, and that an extended opinion is not warranted. See 8th R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.