The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1834•Robert Mems v. City of St. Paul
02-1834Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2003
1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-1507
___________
Gerald Thornton, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
Bob Holden, * District of Missouri.
*
Appellee. * [UNPUBLISHED]
___________
Submitted: April 4, 2003
Filed: April 11, 2003
___________
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gerald Thornton appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 60(b) motion. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the
district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mr. Thornton’s motion. See
Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.) (standard of review; Rule 60(b) is not
vehicle for re-argument of merits, and movant must show exceptional circumstances
-- 1 of 2 --
-2- -2-
to justify relief), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 975 (2001). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.