The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1834•Robert Mems v. City of St. Paul
02-1834Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2003
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3734
___________
Stephen and Sara Galligan, *
*
Appellants, * Appeal from the United States
* Tax Court.
v. *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 4, 2003
Filed: April 15, 2003
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Stephen and Sara Galligan appeal from the tax court's adverse judgment,
following a trial, in their action contesting the assessment of deficiencies in their
federal income taxes for tax years 1996 and 1997. Having carefully reviewed the
record, we conclude the judgment was proper for the reasons explained by the tax
court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.