The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1834•Robert Mems v. City of St. Paul
02-1834Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2003
1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3580
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Western
* District of Missouri.
Roberto Hi-Locortois, also known as *
Robert Garcia-Garcia, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: April 17, 2003
Filed: April 24, 2003
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Roberto Hi-Locortois pleaded guilty to illegally reentering this country after
deportation following an aggravated-felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326(a) and (b)(2), and was sentenced to 57 months imprisonment and 3 years
supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the district court 1 erred in finding two
prior sentences--one for a state drug conviction and one for a federal illegal-reentry
conviction--were not related for criminal-history purposes under U.S.S.G.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
§ 4A1.2(a)(2). Hi-Locortois asserts the cases were consolidated for sentencing, see
U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2, comment. (n.3), because the plea agreements for the two offenses
were inextricably linked.
The district court did not err in considering the sentences to be unrelated, and
thus counting them separately in computing Hi-Locortois’s criminal history. There
was no formal order of consolidation, and the proceedings occurred in different courts
having separate jurisdictions. See United States v. Nicholson, 231 F.3d 445, 455-56
(8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 912 (2001); United States v. Watson, 952 F.2d
982, 990-91 (8th Cir. 1991).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.