The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1834•Robert Mems v. City of St. Paul
02-1834Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2003
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3335
___________
Lloyd Holmes, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
Elaine Chao, Secretary, Department *
of Labor, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 15, 2003
Filed: April 25, 2003
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Lloyd Holmes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint. Having
carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions, we agree with the district
court that it lacked jurisdiction over Holmes’s action. See Duncan v. Dep’t of Labor,
313 F.3d 445, 446 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction).
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Holmes’s pending
motions.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.