The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1834•Robert Mems v. City of St. Paul
02-1834Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2003
1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J.
Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3110
___________
John P. Murphy, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Sheryl Ramstad Hvass; Jeff Peterson; *
John Peterson, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 4, 2003
Filed: April 14, 2003
___________
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
John P. Murphy appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was
proper for the reasons explained by the district court, and that the court did not abuse
its discretion in denying Murphy’s motions to amend his complaint and to compel
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
discovery. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Murphy’s
pending motion.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.