The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1834•Robert Mems v. City of St. Paul
02-1834Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitApr 30, 2003
1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3013
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Sergio Medina-Olvera, * [UNPUBLISHED]
a/k/a Sergio Olvera Medina, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 11, 2003
Filed: April 8, 2003
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Sergio Medina-Olvera (Medina) pleaded guilty to possession with the intent
to distribute over 500 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and
(b)(1)(B) and was sentenced to ninety months’ imprisonment.1 In entering his plea,
Medina reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence that
was seized from his residence and vehicle pursuant to a search warrant. After
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments, we are satisfied that the information
included in the warrant application and affidavit was sufficient to support a finding
of probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. Because we believe that an
extended recitation of the facts and the applicable legal principles would have no
precedential value in this fact-intensive case, we affirm without any further
discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.