The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1066•Peter M. Gaona v. Town & Country
02-1066Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitMar 31, 2003
1 The Honorable Thomas B. Wells, Chief Judge of the United States Tax Court.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3861
___________
Perry Tschida, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * Tax Court
*
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 19, 2003
Filed: March 10, 2003
___________
Before McMILLIAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Perry Tschida appeals the tax court’s 1 dismissal of his amended petition for a
lien or levy action under I.R.C. § 6320(c) or § 6330(d). Our de novo review
persuades us that Tschida’s petition was untimely filed. See I.R.C. §§ 6330(d)(1),
7502; Bueford v. Resolution Trust Corp., 991 F.2d 481, 484 (8th Cir. 1993 ) (standard
of review) . Because the untimely filing deprived the tax court of jurisdiction, and
because the court may consider its jurisdiction on its own motion, we conclude that
the tax court properly dismissed the petition. See Commissioner v. McCoy, 484 U.S.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
3, 7 (1987) (per curiam); Bueford, 991 F.2d at 485; Raymond v. Commissioner, No
2354-01L, 2002 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 48 at *5 & n.3 (T. C. Oct. 22, 2002).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.