The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1292•United States v. Nickolas Conrad
02-1292Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitFeb 28, 2003
*
The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the District of Minnesota.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-3660
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District
v. * of Minnesota.
*
Michael Jay Molzen, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: February 7, 2003
Filed: February 18, 2003
___________
Before BYE, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In September 2002, following his sentencing on a guilty plea to a drug
conspiracy, Michael Jay Molzen filed a pro se motion to correct his change-of-plea
hearing transcript to reflect a change in certain reported testimony. The district court*
denied the motion, and Molzen appeals. Construing Molzen's motion as one under
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, we affirm the district court's decision,
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
particularly given Molzen's failure to present evidentiary support for his contentions.
See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.