The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1025•EEOC v. Liberal R-II School
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 02-2001
___________
Victor A. Ramirez-Ruiz, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of
v. * an Order of the Immigration
* and Naturalization Service.
Immigration and Naturalization *
Service; John D. Ashcroft, Attorney * [UNPUBLISHED]
General of the United States, *
*
Respondents. *
___________
Submitted: December 3, 2002
Filed: December 12, 2002
___________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Victor Ramirez-Ruiz petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which summarily dismissed his appeal from an
Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal,
and protection under the Torture Convention. The BIA concluded that summary
dismissal was appropriate under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(d)(2)(i)(D) (2002) because Ramirez-
Ruiz failed to file a brief after indicating on his Form EOIR-26 that he would do so.
On appeal, however, Ramirez-Ruiz argues only that the Immigration Judge abused
his discretion in denying the asylum petition. Because Ramirez-Ruiz does not
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
challenge the BIA’s summary dismissal, he has waived any challenge to this
independent basis for the BIA’s decision. See United States v. Gonzales, 90 F.3d
1363, 1369-70 (8th Cir. 1996) (failure to assign error or discuss contention in
appellate brief is deemed abandonment of issue).
Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.